Initial revision
This commit is contained in:
88
kernel/exception.c
Executable file
88
kernel/exception.c
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
|
||||
/* This file contains a simple exception handler. Exceptions in user
|
||||
* processes are converted to signals. Exceptions in the kernel, MM and
|
||||
* FS cause a panic.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Changes:
|
||||
* Sep 28, 2004: skip_stop_sequence on exceptions in system processes
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include "kernel.h"
|
||||
#include <signal.h>
|
||||
#include "proc.h"
|
||||
|
||||
/*==========================================================================*
|
||||
* exception *
|
||||
*==========================================================================*/
|
||||
PUBLIC void exception(vec_nr)
|
||||
unsigned vec_nr;
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* An exception or unexpected interrupt has occurred. */
|
||||
|
||||
struct ex_s {
|
||||
char *msg;
|
||||
int signum;
|
||||
int minprocessor;
|
||||
};
|
||||
static struct ex_s ex_data[] = {
|
||||
"Divide error", SIGFPE, 86,
|
||||
"Debug exception", SIGTRAP, 86,
|
||||
"Nonmaskable interrupt", SIGBUS, 86,
|
||||
"Breakpoint", SIGEMT, 86,
|
||||
"Overflow", SIGFPE, 86,
|
||||
"Bounds check", SIGFPE, 186,
|
||||
"Invalid opcode", SIGILL, 186,
|
||||
"Coprocessor not available", SIGFPE, 186,
|
||||
"Double fault", SIGBUS, 286,
|
||||
"Copressor segment overrun", SIGSEGV, 286,
|
||||
"Invalid TSS", SIGSEGV, 286,
|
||||
"Segment not present", SIGSEGV, 286,
|
||||
"Stack exception", SIGSEGV, 286, /* STACK_FAULT already used */
|
||||
"General protection", SIGSEGV, 286,
|
||||
"Page fault", SIGSEGV, 386, /* not close */
|
||||
NIL_PTR, SIGILL, 0, /* probably software trap */
|
||||
"Coprocessor error", SIGFPE, 386,
|
||||
};
|
||||
register struct ex_s *ep;
|
||||
struct proc *saved_proc;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Save proc_ptr, because it may be changed by debug statements. */
|
||||
saved_proc = proc_ptr;
|
||||
|
||||
ep = &ex_data[vec_nr];
|
||||
|
||||
if (vec_nr == 2) { /* spurious NMI on some machines */
|
||||
kprintf("got spurious NMI\n",NO_ARG);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (k_reenter == 0 && isuserp(saved_proc)) {
|
||||
unlock(); /* this is protected like sys_call() */
|
||||
cause_sig(proc_number(saved_proc), ep->signum);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Exception in system code. This is not supposed to happen. */
|
||||
if (ep->msg == NIL_PTR || processor < ep->minprocessor)
|
||||
kprintf("\nIntel-reserved exception %d\n", vec_nr);
|
||||
else
|
||||
kprintf("\n%s\n", karg(ep->msg));
|
||||
kprintf("process number %d", proc_number(saved_proc));
|
||||
kprintf("pc = %d:", (unsigned) saved_proc->p_reg.cs);
|
||||
kprintf("%d\n", (unsigned) saved_proc->p_reg.pc);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the exception originates in the kernel, shut down MINIX. Otherwise,
|
||||
* kill the process that caused it. If MINIX is shut down and the stop
|
||||
* sequence is skipped, the kprintf() output cannot be flushed by the TTY
|
||||
* driver. This leaves the user with a hanging system without proper
|
||||
* notification ...
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (istaskp(saved_proc)) { /* serious problem */
|
||||
skip_stop_sequence = TRUE; /* directly shutdown */
|
||||
panic("exception in a kernel task", NO_NUM);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
clear_proc(saved_proc->p_nr);
|
||||
kprintf("%s was killed by MINIX due to an exception",
|
||||
karg(saved_proc->p_name));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user