Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bahadir Balban
df2317e7aa exchange_registers(), modified thread_control calls seem to work
- Fixed do_mmap() so that it returns mapped address, and various bugs.
- A child seems to fork with new setup, but with incorrect return value.
  Need to use and test exregs() for fork + clone.
- Shmat searches an unmapped area if input arg is invalid, do_mmap()
  should do this.
2008-09-15 15:59:44 +03:00
Bahadir Balban
4fb5277123 Towards finishing exchange_registers()
- Added mutex_trylock()
- Implemented most of exchange_registers()
- thread_control() now needs a lock for operations that can modify thread context.
- thread_start() does not initialise scheduler flags, now done in thread_create.

TODO:
- Fork/clone'ed threads should retain their context in tcb, not syscall stack.
- exchange_registers() calls in userspace need cleaning up.
2008-09-13 18:07:00 +03:00
Bahadir Balban
af03975dc1 Towards adding sys_clone()
Stopped working on self_spawn() - going to finish clone() syscall first.
Arch-specific clone() library call that does ipc() and cloned child setup.
- Need to finish thread_create() that satisfy clone() necessities. i.e. setting up its stack.
  Question: Does the pager (and thus the microkernel) have to explicitly set SP_USR?
  Once the call is known to be successful, the library could set it.
2008-09-11 16:56:41 +03:00
Bahadir Balban
a87914910c Added a new system call sys_timer.
sys_timer accumulates timer ticks into seconds, minutes, hours and days.
It's left to the user to calculate from days into a date. It is not yet
known if the calculation is even roughly correct.

Reduced 2 kmem_reclaim/grant calls into one kmem_control call.
2008-04-18 00:46:29 +01:00
Bahadir Balban
55d24dbbdf Managed to pass utcb information to tasks via an ipc() call.
Removed setting of tag during ipc_return(). So it does not overwrite
return value anymore.

Next stage is for the tasks to map their utcb via shmget/shmat before
accessing.
2008-03-19 02:55:31 +00:00
Bahadir Balban
16617eed36 Various changes to incorporate new utcb setup.
Issues with l4_return value not reaching client side
	modified:   libs/c/include/stdio.h
	modified:   src/arch/arm/exception.c
	modified:   src/glue/arm/init.c
	modified:   tasks/fs0/src/task.c
	modified:   tasks/libl4/include/l4lib/arch-arm/utcb.h
	modified:   tasks/libl4/src/arm/syscalls.S
	modified:   tasks/libl4/src/init.c
	deleted:    tasks/libl4/tagfilelist
	modified:   tasks/libposix/open.c
	modified:   tasks/mm0/include/utcb.h
	modified:   tasks/mm0/include/vm_area.h
	modified:   tasks/mm0/main.c
	modified:   tasks/mm0/src/init.c
	modified:   tasks/mm0/src/task.c
	modified:   tasks/mm0/src/utcb.c
	modified:   tasks/mm0/src/vm_object.c
2008-03-19 02:27:53 +00:00
Bahadir Balban
55117c600b Back to the same fs0 bug point as before, but environment, disjoint utcb addresses
and passing of utcb address information via the environment are implemented.
2008-02-29 12:33:53 +00:00
Bahadir Balban
dce3a9a47c Merged some libl4 utcb headers, moved mr defs to kernel message.h
Headers 3 headers related to message registers and utcbs are now merged under
utcb.h in libl4. Some message register definitions used by the kernel are now
moved into kernel's glue/message.h. This avoids the duplication of same
definitions. Also the total number of mregs are now determined by arch-specific
kernel header, which is good.
2008-02-11 11:45:21 +00:00
Bahadir Balban
f29c18ec09 Fixed various errors with ipc message passing.
Previously we had changed the method of setting the ipc tag from l4_ipc() call
argument to being passed as a message register.

- This change was not reflected in l4_ipc() signature as it still had a 3rd argument,
  even though ignored.

- l4_set_sender and _set_tag had their arguments wrong way around.
- Previously 5 mrs were passed onto utcb instead of 6, relying on the fact that
  l4_ipc tag argument was being passed in r3 directly, this wasnt true anymore
  with new convention, but wasn't catered for.

TODO:
- MM0 shouldn't really allocate tids itself, but use ones supplied by C0.
- Sender tid shouldn't really passed by the sender task, but rather by C0. Otherwise
  security can be easily breached by user tasks pretending to be other tasks. This
  would also save us a message register.
2008-02-06 12:26:31 +00:00
Bahadir Balban
e2b791a3d8 Initial commit 2008-01-13 13:53:52 +00:00