mirror of
https://github.com/drasko/codezero.git
synced 2026-01-12 02:43:15 +01:00
Changes in README. Fixes to fault handling.
Yet to investigate why adding a printf format attribute to stdio.h does not generate warnings for invalid arguments to printf.
This commit is contained in:
73
README
73
README
@@ -86,38 +86,55 @@ directories for their respective licenses.
|
||||
Why yet another POSIX microkernel?
|
||||
|
||||
There are many open source POSIX operating systems with advanced features such
|
||||
as *BSD and Linux. However these were originally not designed for embedded
|
||||
systems. Unix itself and all the tools built upon weren't meant for using on
|
||||
small devices. Accordingly, these operating systems contain a lot of historical
|
||||
code. Linux is well established, and targets a broad range of platforms and
|
||||
uses, but consequently embedded platforms don't always get enough emphasis. Also
|
||||
such well established, mature systems tend to oppose major design overhauls,
|
||||
which limits innovation to a certain extent. In addition, their code base is so
|
||||
big, that it gets more and more difficult to understand how their internals
|
||||
work. Usually much of the code is irrelevant to the problem, in case of embedded
|
||||
systems. Codezero is written from scratch to solely target embedded systems and
|
||||
as BSD versions and Linux. However, neither of these were originally designed
|
||||
for embedded systems. Multiple problems arise due to this fact.
|
||||
|
||||
These systems are well established. They target a broad range of platforms and
|
||||
uses, but consequently their user base has saturated, and embedded platforms
|
||||
don't get enough emphasis.
|
||||
|
||||
Unix itself and all the tools built upon weren't meant for using on small
|
||||
devices. Accordingly, these operating systems contain a lot of historical code.
|
||||
Their code base is so big, that it gets more and more difficult to understand
|
||||
how their internals work. On these systems usually much of the code is
|
||||
irrelevant to a new problem, and embedded systems tend to raise new problems
|
||||
often. Codezero is written from scratch to solely target embedded systems and
|
||||
as such the source code is %100 relevant. It is small and free from legacy code.
|
||||
Finally monolithic kernels may have issues with dependability due to much of the
|
||||
code sharing the same address space. Being a microkernel design, Codezero aims
|
||||
to defeat this problem and increase dependability.
|
||||
|
||||
Other than these modern kernels, there is systems software targeting embedded
|
||||
devices. Most of them are proprietary, with their own users. Some of the open
|
||||
source ones are structurally too simplistic, and lack modern features such as
|
||||
paging. There are existing embedded OS'es that are well-designed, but Codezero
|
||||
provides alternative that will follow the open source development principles
|
||||
more closely. This will prove useful because many embedded systems still use
|
||||
older development methods and the right open source methodology would prove
|
||||
favorable in the fast-paced nature of development.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, there are new ideas in OS literature that would improve Unix but aren't
|
||||
implemented either because they have no existing users or may break compatibility
|
||||
somewhat (e.g. some are presented in Plan 9). As well as practising realistic
|
||||
development methodologies, Codezero project aims to keep up with the latest OS
|
||||
literature and provide the opportunity to incorporate the latest ideas in OS
|
||||
technology.
|
||||
From a design perspective, due to these kernels having a monolithic design, they
|
||||
may have issues with dependability due to much of the code sharing the same
|
||||
address space. This is an important issue on embedded systems since their
|
||||
operation is more sensitive to disruptions. Being a microkernel design, Codezero
|
||||
aims to defeat this problem and increase dependability.
|
||||
|
||||
Other than these modern kernels, there are existing operating systems targeting
|
||||
embedded devices. Most of them are proprietary, with their own users. Some of
|
||||
them are structurally too simplistic, and lack modern features such as paging.
|
||||
There ones that are well established, but Codezero will contrast them by
|
||||
providing an alternative that will follow the open source development principles
|
||||
more closely. Many embedded systems still use older development methods and the
|
||||
right open source methodology would prove favorable in the fast-paced nature of
|
||||
development.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, there are new ideas in literature that would improve systems software
|
||||
but aren't implemented either because they have no existing users or may break
|
||||
compatibility (e.g. some are presented in Plan 9). Existing kernels tend to
|
||||
oppose major design overhauls, which limits their innovation capability for this
|
||||
kind of experimentation. As well as practising realistic development methods
|
||||
Codezero project aims to keep up with the latest OS literature and provide the
|
||||
opportunity to incorporate the latest ideas in OS technology.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Can you summarise all this? Why should I use Codezero, again?
|
||||
|
||||
Codezero is an operating system that targets embedded systems. It supports the
|
||||
most fundamental posix system calls. Different from other posix-like systems,
|
||||
it is based on a microkernel design. It supports modern features such as
|
||||
demand-paging, virtual filesystem support. It has a cleanly separated set of
|
||||
services, and it is small. Therefore it is a good candidate as systems software
|
||||
to be used on embedded systems. Currently it has little or no users, and yet it
|
||||
is about to become usable, therefore compared to systems with a saturated user
|
||||
base it is possible to tailor it rapidly towards the needs of any users who want
|
||||
to be the first to use it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ int setvbuf(FILE *, char *, int, size_t);
|
||||
/* 7.19.6 Format i/o functions */
|
||||
int fprintf(FILE *, const char *, ...);
|
||||
int fscanf(FILE *, const char *, ...);
|
||||
int printf(const char *, ...);
|
||||
int printf(const char *format, ...); __attribute__((format (printf, 1, 2)));
|
||||
int scanf(const char *, ...);
|
||||
int snprintf(char *, size_t , const char *, ...);
|
||||
int sprintf(char *, const char *, ...);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ int check_aborts(u32 faulted_pc, u32 fsr, u32 far)
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_prefetch_abort(fsr)) {
|
||||
dprintk("Prefetch abort @ ", faulted_pc);
|
||||
dbg_abort("Prefetch abort @ ", faulted_pc);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
|
||||
#include <l4lib/types.h>
|
||||
#include <l4lib/utcb.h>
|
||||
#include <lib/addr.h>
|
||||
#include <l4/api/kip.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#define __TASKNAME__ __PAGERNAME__
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
|
||||
* Copyright (C) 2007 Bahadir Balban
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#include <arch/mm.h>
|
||||
#include <task.h>
|
||||
|
||||
/* Extracts generic protection flags from architecture-specific pte */
|
||||
unsigned int vm_prot_flags(pte_t pte)
|
||||
@@ -51,11 +52,9 @@ void set_generic_fault_params(struct fault_data *fault)
|
||||
else
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
printf("%s: Handling %s fault (%s abort) from %d. fault @ 0x%x\n",
|
||||
__TASKNAME__, (fault->reason & VM_READ) ? "read" : "write",
|
||||
is_prefetch_abort(fault->kdata->fsr) ? "prefetch" : "data",
|
||||
fault->task->tid, fault->address);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -271,10 +271,10 @@ int copy_on_write(struct fault_data *fault)
|
||||
* when there are shadows one is created because a fork had just
|
||||
* happened, in which case all shadows are rendered read-only.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(vmo->flags & VM_WRITE)) {
|
||||
if (!(vmo_link->obj->flags & VM_WRITE)) {
|
||||
if (!(shadow_link = vma_create_shadow()))
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
printf("%s: Created a shadow.\n", __TASKNAME__);
|
||||
/* Initialise the shadow */
|
||||
shadow = shadow_link->obj;
|
||||
shadow->refcnt = 1;
|
||||
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ int copy_on_write(struct fault_data *fault)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Update page details */
|
||||
spin_lock(&new_page->lock);
|
||||
new_page->refcnt = 1;
|
||||
new_page->refcnt = 0;
|
||||
new_page->owner = copier_link->obj;
|
||||
new_page->offset = file_offset;
|
||||
new_page->virtual = 0;
|
||||
@@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ int copy_on_write(struct fault_data *fault)
|
||||
(void *)page_align(fault->address), 1,
|
||||
(reason & VM_READ) ? MAP_USR_RO_FLAGS : MAP_USR_RW_FLAGS,
|
||||
fault->task->tid);
|
||||
printf("%s: Mapped 0x%x as writable to tid %d.\n", __TASKNAME__,
|
||||
page_align(fault->address), fault->task->tid);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Finished handling the actual fault, now check for possible
|
||||
@@ -403,11 +405,14 @@ int __do_page_fault(struct fault_data *fault)
|
||||
__TASKNAME__);
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Map it to faulty task */
|
||||
l4_map((void *)page_to_phys(page),
|
||||
(void *)page_align(fault->address), 1,
|
||||
(reason & VM_READ) ? MAP_USR_RO_FLAGS : MAP_USR_RW_FLAGS,
|
||||
fault->task->tid);
|
||||
printf("%s: Mapped 0x%x as readable to tid %d.\n", __TASKNAME__,
|
||||
page_align(fault->address), fault->task->tid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Handle write */
|
||||
@@ -435,6 +440,8 @@ int __do_page_fault(struct fault_data *fault)
|
||||
(void *)page_align(fault->address), 1,
|
||||
(reason & VM_READ) ? MAP_USR_RO_FLAGS : MAP_USR_RW_FLAGS,
|
||||
fault->task->tid);
|
||||
printf("%s: Mapped 0x%x as writable to tid %d.\n", __TASKNAME__,
|
||||
page_align(fault->address), fault->task->tid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* FIXME: Just do fs files for now, anon shm objects later. */
|
||||
BUG_ON((vma_flags & VMA_SHARED) && (vma_flags & VMA_ANONYMOUS));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ int do_mmap(struct vm_file *mapfile, unsigned long file_offset,
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
vmo_link->obj = &mapfile->vm_obj;
|
||||
mapfile->vm_obj.refcnt++;
|
||||
list_add_tail(&vmo_link->list, &new->vm_obj_list);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Finished initialising the vma, add it to task */
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -181,21 +181,33 @@ struct page *bootfile_page_in(struct vm_object *vm_obj,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct vm_file *boot_file = vm_object_to_file(vm_obj);
|
||||
struct svc_image *img = boot_file->priv_data;
|
||||
struct page *page = phys_to_page(img->phys_start +
|
||||
__pfn_to_addr(offset));
|
||||
struct page *page;
|
||||
|
||||
/* TODO: Check file length against page offset! */
|
||||
/* Check first if the file has such a page at all */
|
||||
if (__pfn(page_align_up(boot_file->length) <= offset)) {
|
||||
printf("%s: %s: Trying to look up page %d, but file length "
|
||||
"is %d bytes.\n", __TASKNAME__, __FUNCTION__,
|
||||
offset, boot_file->length);
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Update page */
|
||||
page_init(page);
|
||||
page->refcnt++;
|
||||
/* The page is not resident in page cache. */
|
||||
if (!(page = find_page(vm_obj, offset))) {
|
||||
page = phys_to_page(img->phys_start + __pfn_to_addr(offset));
|
||||
|
||||
/* Update object */
|
||||
vm_obj->npages++;
|
||||
/* Update page */
|
||||
page_init(page);
|
||||
page->refcnt++;
|
||||
page->owner = vm_obj;
|
||||
page->offset = offset;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Add the page to owner's list of in-memory pages */
|
||||
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&page->list));
|
||||
insert_page_olist(page, vm_obj);
|
||||
/* Update object */
|
||||
vm_obj->npages++;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Add the page to owner's list of in-memory pages */
|
||||
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&page->list));
|
||||
insert_page_olist(page, vm_obj);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return page;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user