Followed the kernel physical memory reservation convention
with devices. Devices that are possessable by userspace
are created as boot-time capabilities and placed under the kernel
resources devmem_free capability list. Any userspace container
that is defined with the possession of the device would delete the
device capability making it unavailable to further requests.
It is not very straightforward to reach a capabilities list. We
now use a single function to find out a capability by its id and
its list, since the two are used frequently together (i.e. cap
removal and destruction)
Implemented a protocol between a client and its pager to
request and get a capability to ipc to another client of the pager.
Pager first ensures the request is valid from its client.
It then tries to use a greater capability that it possesses, to
produce a new capability that the client requested. Once the kernel
validates the correct one and replicates/reduces it to client's
need, it grants it to the client.
In posix, test0 makes inter-space ipc for testing extended ipc. This
correctly fails when only the cap to ipc to pager is given to all tasks
in the container.
In order to overcome this problem, the tasks who fork for doing ipc to
each other make a request to the pager to get capabilities to do so.
Pager finds its own widened ipc capability over the container, replicates
it, validates and reduces it to desired boundaries (i.e. just ipc betw.
two spaces) and grants it as IMMUTABLE to requesting tasks.
This protocol may be useful in implementing a client/server capability
request relationship. Code builds but untested.
Capability checking for thread_control, exregs, mutex, cap_control,
ipc, and map system calls.
The visualised model is implemented in code that compiles, but
actual functionality hasn't been tested.
Need to add:
- Dynamic assignment of initial resources matching with what's
defined in the configuration.
- A paged-thread-group, since that would be a logical group of
seperation from a capability point-of-view.
- Resource ids for various tasks. E.g.
- Memory capabilities don't have target resources.
- Thread capability assumes current container for THREAD_CREATE.
- Mutex syscall assumes current thread (this one may not need
any changing)
- cap_control syscall assumes current thread. It may happen to
be that another thread's capability list is manipulated.
Last but not least:
- A simple and easy-to-use userspace library for dynamic expansion
of resource domains as new resources are created such as threads.
Capabilities will be shared among collection of threads. A pager
will have a right to share its own capabilities with its space,
its thread group and its container.
Currently sharing is possible with only all of the caps. Next,
it will be support for cap splitting, granting, and partial sharing
and granting.
